That methodology makes sense in narrow economic terms, and after all, it sounds like the goal of the report was to measure economic costs. But it's always slightly uncomfortable to me when illness among some groups of people is considered more costly than illness among others...
That methodology makes sense in narrow economic terms, and after all, it sounds like the goal of the report was to measure economic costs. But it's always slightly uncomfortable to me when illness among some groups of people is considered more costly than illness among others...
Thanks for sharing this!
That methodology makes sense in narrow economic terms, and after all, it sounds like the goal of the report was to measure economic costs. But it's always slightly uncomfortable to me when illness among some groups of people is considered more costly than illness among others...
I totally agree with you.