In addition, the five selected #GGA indicators for food and agriculture are not measurable. They are full of terms, which can be interpreted differently, or are just completely vague. This will lead to an endless debate on their meaning, which further diminish their value.
Thank you, that's a great point and one I had missed because I was looking for food systems and sustainability aspects. I just went back and re-read the five indicators again and I see endless debates coming up, as you predict. What are "practices and technologies relevant to climate change adaptation" and how do we decide if there is "equitable access" and what level of "food and nutrition" is considered adequate?
In addition, the five selected #GGA indicators for food and agriculture are not measurable. They are full of terms, which can be interpreted differently, or are just completely vague. This will lead to an endless debate on their meaning, which further diminish their value.
Thank you, that's a great point and one I had missed because I was looking for food systems and sustainability aspects. I just went back and re-read the five indicators again and I see endless debates coming up, as you predict. What are "practices and technologies relevant to climate change adaptation" and how do we decide if there is "equitable access" and what level of "food and nutrition" is considered adequate?